Leadership, Organisations

Taking a Long-Term Sustainable Business Perspective

  • 9:09 am
  • July 10, 2025

In 2014 Pfizer launched a bid for AstraZeneca (about £70bn). AstraZeneca, sceptical of the business case for a deal, managed to resist after a bitter battle. It turns out that Pfizer’s case was to solve its big problems of a 24% corporate tax rate; an accumulation of roughly $17bn in overseas cash, which would attract a hefty penalty if repatriated to the US; and a patchy pipeline of new drugs, confirming AstraZeneca’s scepticism that it “appears to have been fundamentally driven by the corporate financial benefits to its shareholders of cost savings and tax minimisation”. Just days ago, perhaps similarly, Unilever rejected Kraft’s £115bn takeover bid.

This way of looking at corporate value should not go unquestioned. As Andrew Haldane, Chief Economist at the Bank of England said “Despite its durability and success, across countries and across time, the corporate model has not gone unquestioned… (there is) a rising tide of criticism of companies’ behaviour, from excessive executive remuneration, to unethical practices, to monopoly or oligopoly powers, to short-termism.  These concerns appear to be both strongly-felt and widely-held.”

What might be getting in the way of business and its leaders from taking a long term sustainable perspective?

Casting light on some myths of corporate ownership and long term value will, I believe, help us better navigate to a more sustainable and satisfying future.

A brief history of company ownership

While the history of companies goes back a long-time, incorporation was set out in England in the early 17th century. The famous East India Company received its Royal Charter in 1600 as a joint-stock company. Never-the-less it wasn’t until the middle of the 19th century, in England at least, that the more significant change happened, the move from unlimited liability to limited liability companies. The company limited by shares, both private and public, has gone on to become the predominant company form and remains so today.

With this change, a ‘share’ was no longer an interest in the company’s assets and liabilities but a claim on future profits. It became the company itself who own its assets and liabilities. The concept of the legal person was established – it is the company, as a legal person, who sues or is sued. Many have pointed out that a more accurate term would be ‘no liability’, as a shareholder only stands to lose the value of their shares and has no liability for the actions of the company.

From a situation in which share owners were personally liable, and therefore had great interest in the actions of the company, the relationship between share ownership and an interest in control became less important, and thus the responsibility involved in ownership waned. There we also, of course, great benefits because of the more efficient use of capital.

Shareholder primacy

In a foundational governance text in 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means raised a concern that the corporation might become ‘ownerless’, where directors become dominated by their managerial role rather than their supervisory one and act in their own interests without accountability to their shareholders. The logic was that if shareholders are the risk-takers they have most incentive for company success and are best placed to exercise control rights. This led to the idea of ‘shareholder primacy’ where the primary responsibility of directors is the success of the company for the benefit of the shareholders, which mitigates the risk of director’s interests deviating from those of the shareholders (the ‘principal/agent problem’).

Shareholder primacy and the relationship between the company, directors and shareholders still leads to confusion today; for example, directors are the agents of the company; they are not agents of the shareholders. Shareholders have no right to instruct directors. They can elect, or not elect, directors, which might give the impression that they can instruct them, as it gives them indirect power and influence.

As an example Paul Polman as CEO of Unilever has tried to turn this ownership convention on its head, urging shareholders to put their money somewhere else if they don’t buy into Unilever’s long-term sustainability value-creation strategy. He made it clear that short term speculative shareholders are not welcome and shareholders should no longer expect to see quarterly reports along with earnings guidance for the stock market from the company. For Polman and Unilever this may well be put to the test as Kraft consider their takeover options.

This recognises that shareholders are not the only risk takers; there are others, including employees, suppliers, the environment and wider society, as we’ve seen most obviously during the financial crisis. This recognition exposes the flaw in shareholder primacy.

The shareholder ownership myth

The shareholder-centric view has gone on to become the dominant narrative and reinforced the idea of shareholders as owners. Despite shareholders no longer being the owners of company assets (or liabilities) over 150 years later we still hear the assertion that they are. They are not the owners of companies, they own shares with certain rights attached.

It is perhaps understandable why this myth persists as, at least partly, we still afford shareholders primacy and some ‘ownership’ rights. Here in the UK they include the right to vote on director elections as well as receiving a dividend.

That the long-term interests of companies may conflict with short term interests of many investors is obvious and is at the heart of the problem with the current model, we keep hearing calls to take a long-term perspective yet those leading companies believe they are there to satisfy masters with often short term interests. There is an inherent conflict in the model which raises the question of how to evolve this otherwise almost inevitable outcome?

The maximising shareholder value myth

By the 1980s another myth took shape – that there is a requirement for companies and therefore their directors to maximise shareholder value (MSV). The implication is that the success of, and even the purpose of, the company is to MSV. There is no such requirement.

Unfortunately, the combination of soft-law standards of financial accounting and corporate governance codes “powerfully define the domains of accountability of corporate management in ways that support MSV”. So MSV became locked-in in many ways:

  • Executive pay being tied to stock price performance legitimised MSV which led to dividends and buy-backs where executives become beneficiaries
  • Increasing short-term pressures on CEO’s (from shareholders) as demonstrated by the shortening of CEO tenure
  • Encouraging cost-cutting, downsizing, and distributing cash to shareholders rather than investment in productive activities like research & development, capital investment, and employee development–and hence away from innovation. This is ultimately a race to the bottom
  • Encouraging mergers and acquisitions to show short-term returns, often at the expense of long-term value
  • Encouraging financial engineering, and legitimising international tax (avoidance) structures, as being an MSV obligation

This combination of ideas: shareholders as owners, shareholder primacy, and MSV, became the dominant ideology and persists to this day. As we have seen in recent years, it has at its worst caused enormous damage not the least of which the privatisation of gains and socialisation of losses. If MSV were a legal requirement, we might rightly question its wisdom. That it is not a legal requirement and yet is treated as if it were, belies rational explanation. This is now beginning to be questioned led by initiatives like Tomorrow’s Company, the Purpose of the Corporation Project, and the Modern Corporation Project.

The capital market myth

We are often led to believe that capital markets are the oil that lubricates the entrepreneurial machine and that stock markets are central to this. This is greatly overplayed, as except when purchasing shares in the primary market, eg at the initial public offerings stage, purchasing shares does not provide capital to the company. It is simply the exchange of shares between buyers and sellers with no movement of capital to the company. This has become more of an investment market where ownership and its responsibilities are less, if at all, relevant.

Moving to a more sustainable future

I find it interesting that despite evidence of a failing model of governance, there are many companies doing a fantastic job, whether serving their customers and wider stakeholders (employees, communities, etc) and rewarding investors and being purposeful businesses. They are managing this under the current ownership and governance model, yet I sense the model is not yet actively supporting the shift to a long term sustainable perspective. As Tomorrow’s Company say “continually updating how our companies are owned and governed will be critical to creating wealth in these uncertain times.” While we see some examples of adapted company forms like B-Corp emerging it seems there is much more needed.

Two recent reports by Tomorrow’s Company (Promoting long-term wealth: reshaping corporate governance and the Purpose of the Corporation Project (Corporate Governance for a Changing World: Report of a Global Roundtable Series) include a number of areas of focus:

  • Purposeful business – Purpose beyond profit reflecting a long-term focus and embedding this in the governance structure.
  • Clarity in the boardroom – Both clarification of director duties, with respect to the long-term success of the company, the focus on long-term sustainable value creation, stakeholder interests, and environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; and better board practices enabling more focus on long-term decisions. And potentially reform of company law.
  • Active stewardship – Increased voice for stakeholders (as well as investors) on long-term value creation.
  • Patient capital – Create pools of patient capital, encourage stewardship investors, and provide these investors with greater influence.
  • Transparency – Corporate accounting and reporting could reflect a long-term value creation strategy by considering non-financial capitals.
  • Education – Academic curricula of corporate law, management, accounting and economics could be developed to reflect a broad understanding of corporate purpose and a long term sustainable perspective.

At the Creating Sustainable Companies Summit I heard John Kay recount how on route to the company’s demise ICI’s purpose changed from: “The world’s leading chemical company serving customers internationally, through the innovative and responsible application of chemistry and related science. Through the achievement of our aim we will enhance the wealth and wellbeing of our shareholders our employees our customers and the communities which we serve and in which we operate.”

to:

“Our objective is to maximise value for our shareholders by focusing on businesses where we have a market leadership, a technology edge, and a world competitive cost base”.

Conversely Ray Anderson, late CEO of Interface said “there is no more strategic issue for a company, or any organization, than its ultimate purpose. For those who think business exists to make a profit, I suggest they think again. Business makes a profit to exist. Surely it must exist for some higher, nobler purpose than that.”

Andrew Haldane, reflected recently “Challenges to the shareholder-centric company model are rising, both from within and outside the corporate sector.  These criticisms have deep micro-economic roots and thick macro-economic branches.  Some incremental change is occurring to trim these branches.  But it may be time for a more fundamental re-rooting of company law if we are to tackle these problems at source.  The stakes – for companies, the economy and wider society – could scarcely be higher.”

If you would like to discuss your strategy for a long term sustainable value and purposeful business, please email me.

Richard Baker is an Associate of Future Considerations with over 20 years’ experience in supporting organisations to develop new ways of working that better reflects the complexity of the modern work environment. He specialises in organisational design, corporate governance and Board practices.

This blog is an adaption of an article originally published in Enlivening Edge Magazine.

 

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In Your Inbox

Stay up to date with our latest thinking, why not sign up to receive our quarterly newsletter. We promise we won’t share your details to anyone.
FOLLOW US
EUROPE

Future Considerations Ltd

86-90 Paul Street

London

EC2A 4NE

Phone: +44(0) 2074 921 790

[email protected]

ASIA

Future Considerations Ltd

29 Adonis Street, Acropolis

Subdivision, Libis,

Quezon City,

Philippines 1110

[email protected]

All rights reserved Future Considerations 2025. | Privacy Policy
Jules brings over 45 years of experience to boosting people’s motivation and purposeful contribution to their roles and organisations. With first-hand experience of senior leadership in the private and non-profit sectors and 15 as a consultant.

Jules designs and delivers leadership development and partnering programmes for all levels of leaders and managers. Trained to coach individuals and teams to build trust, techniques and resilience in a volatile and complex world. Clients include Arup, Philips, PwC, Aegon, British Council, and both Universities in Sheffield.

Jules specialises in bringing personal insight and awareness to individuals and teams to help transform their effectiveness and productivity. Jules brings humanity and lightness to the serious work of deepening understanding between people and developing the skills and mastery needed for cooperation to thrive.
Pete has over 20 years of experience helping individuals and organisations achieve their aims. He works with individuals, teams, and entire organisations to this end and has worked with organisations across the public, private, and non-profit sectors. Previous clients include Barclays, Boston Consulting Group, HSBC, KPMG, and the UK and Singapore Civil Services.

His speciality lies in the area of Embodied Leadership and Somatic Coaching, where he has written a book and completed a PhD. In addition, he works with conflict in organisations, an area where he has a keen interest. He has many years of experience in action and self-managed learning processes and supervises PhD students on Hult Ashridge’s Doctorate in Organisational Change.

Pete lives in Brighton with his wife and young daughter, reads widely, loves to cook, and practises martial arts.
Lycia’s work is about unlocking potential in pursuit of our dreams to make the world a better place. Her focus is on teams and the magic of what people achieve together.

She takes a systemic approach that shines a light on the deeper dynamics influencing our perception and choices. She accompanies and resources leaders and ‘top teams’ in their role as shapers. She helps groups build cultures for innovation and extraordinary partnership. She helps people explore resistance and stuckness, and what is limiting their success and fulfilment. People are able to act with more awareness, alignment, impact and ease.

Lycia works with groups of all flavours and sizes, sectors and industries.
She is somewhat of a complexity nerd, and is certified in Leadership Circle and Collective Leadership Assessment, the Organisation Workshop (the work of Barry Oshry) and has trained continuously since 2011 in systemic constellations.
With 20 years’ experience working in the international arena, James has coached leaders of international organisations and multinational corporations for performance enhancement in multi-cultural settings and develops the capacity of senior management to work productively in diverse teams.

As a facilitator, James excels in working in multi-cultural, multi-disciplinary teams using innovative, solution-oriented methodologies. He facilitates multi-stakeholder processes to co-create joint strategies and plans for joint ventures, mergers and collaborative poverty reduction strategies. In order to ensure success of these plans, James provides coaching on change management, organisational culture and performance management.

James uses a range of coaching tools and techniques which support learning and performance and has certificates in Systems Coaching, embodied Coaching and Constellations. Clients include JP Morgan, Daimler FS India, Pertamina, The Australian Embassy in Jakarta, Kantar, IFC Hong Kong and Bank Negara Indonesia.
Patricia is a deep listener, being able to see what is really needed and alive beyond what is initially said or seen (making the invisible visible). She establishes a safe and inviting learning space where people feel comfortable to step out of their comfort zone and stretch themselves to the edges of their abilities.

She designs learning programmes, workshops and coaching interventions that are fit to the challenge of growing people and that are fresh, engaging and motivational and she facilitates with compassion, depth and humour. She is a ICF certified coach, specialising in systemic coaching of organisations and individuals.

She has over 20 years business experience, including as head of Learning and Development for a large bank before starting her own business in leadership and organisational development - consulting, training, facilitating and coaching. Her clients are globally spread in different industries and sectors including finance, automotive, insurance, pharmaceutical, supply chain, manufacturers.
Jaroslav has been developing leaders for over 20 years during which he designed and delivered more than 10,000 hours of global development programmes, coaching sessions, workshops and learning interventions for clients such as Bayer, HSBC, Shell, Mars, Vodafone, Microsoft, Ford, KPMG and Accenture.
He specialises in leadership coaching, innovative learning design and helping people successfully partner with AI in their life and work.

Jaroslav has personally coached close to 500 senior and mid-level leaders on topics such as improving performance, career progression, building a high-performing team and others. He has designed and built numerous self-paced and cohort-based online development programmes, which include virtual coaching and delivery.

He has also been trained as a futurist at Singularity University and spent close to 10 years training and coaching future-focused innovators, entrepreneurs, business owners and thought-leaders globally.
Celine is a coach, consultant and facilitator, working with change-makers to reshape the world of work, business and society. With 30 years’ experience across brand strategy, sustainability, organisational development and coaching, Celine works with leaders and teams to align Purpose, Meaning and Impact. Her clients include large corporations, NGOs, charities & foundations & educational institutions.

Celine is a certified practitioner and trainer with Map of Meaning International, bringing a powerful framework for cultivating meaningful work at individual, team and organisational levels. She is also the founder of Meaningful Futures, a social innovation project giving young people the skills and confidence to craft meaningful and regenerative careers.

Celine holds an MSc in Responsibility and Business Practice and advanced coaching qualifications. She draws on a wealth of experience in personal transformation and systems thinking to help clients build confidence and clarity to lead complex change from who they are, or put simply: to be themselves and do what matters.
As a facilitator, Louie’s practice includes the design and delivery of structured learning solutions for organisations and teams for both local and international companies located in the Philippines, wider Asia region and the world.
His interests are in the realm of leadership, individual and team development. Louies 22 years of experience includes working with middle management up to the C-suite level. As a coach, Louie combines somatic practices to support his clients in understanding the connection of mind, heart and body. He uses a wholistic approach as a base to provide space for sustainable change. He encourages people to break barriers, challenge what is current and move them to a space of choice and action.

Louie’s training and education involve Somatics, Emotional Intelligence, Interactive Strategies, Action Reflection Learning, NLP, Spiral Dynamics, Improvisation, Transition Coaching, Appreciative Inquiry and he is a certified coach.
Dick brings over 30 years of experience helping organisations navigate complex change and is passionate about helping people engage in purposeful work in a meaningful way.

He delivers leadership development programmes, coaching individuals and teams to build capability, confidence and resilience in a changing world. Recent clients include Arup, Aegon, Zurich, Prudential, and Phillips, with experience spanning from new managers to senior leadership and board level.

His work focuses on systemic approaches to organisational transformation, new ways of working such as self-managing systems, and effective governance. Dick brings a calm, grounded presence and is known for his ability to hold space for deep reflection and practical progress.
Laura specialises in embedding growth mindset at the heart of how organisations operate, lead, and evolve. Her mission is to help people and their organisations become more adaptable in today’s complex world, without the disruption and resistance that often accompany traditional change programmes. By fostering a culture of continuous learning, resilience, and psychological safety, Laura empowers individuals and teams to challenge assumptions, shift behaviours, and drive sustainable transformation.

With over 20 years of commercial experience, Laura brings a unique blend of strategic insight and human-centred practice. Beginning her career at Unilever, she has since worked across many sectors, including Infrastructure, Defence, Finance, Healthcare, Energy, and Government - leading large-scale programmes and enabling leadership development from graduate to C-suite levels. Her work focuses on equipping people with the skills and mindsets needed to lead change, collaborate effectively, and perform at their best in uncertain environments.

Laura loves horse riding and rowing and has 2 young children that occupy much of her spare time!
Since 2000, Beth has been a consultant, coach and facilitator. Beth has coached C-suite executives all over the world. She coaches leadership teams, including those in start-up or transition. Beth has also been part of the development staff in many leadership faculties for multinational organisations such as Shell, Philips, Adidas, Jollibee Food Corporation, British Petroleum and others. Her ability to work across multiple cultures has been honed through her leadership responsibilities as a global senior executive at Johnson & Johnson and through worldwide and regional assignments in leadership development for a range of multinationals as a programme developer and executive coach.

Abundant energy and physical stamina, Beth has an infectious but grounded energy. Her communication skills carry her comfortably from the lecture hall to the boardroom. Her coaching skills can give an invaluable boost to rising, or temporarily sputtering, organisational stars. She has been recognised for her unique ability to draw out extraordinary performance in organisations and teams with diverse members.
Jon’s early career designing applications led to him becoming IT director for a market-leading multinational. His systemic perspective, allied with a background in psychology and subsequent leadership experience inside major organisations was followed by intensive learning in personal development, values systems and multiple intelligences. Brought together, these create a transformational perspective for understanding and developing organisations as living systems.

Jon is a master trainer in Spiral Dynamics, a founder director of the UK chapter of Conscious Capitalism and a certified Spiritual Intelligence coach. He is the author of several books and articles and is developer of Relational Being, a visionary whole-systems approach to evidence-based spirituality, complexity science, human emergence, societal change and conscious business. This breadth of experience and deep understanding informs his work as a consultant, coach, trainer and facilitator
Jon Freeman, UK

Jon’s early career designing applications led to him becoming IT director for a market-leading multinational. His systemic perspective, allied with a background in psychology and subsequent leadership experience inside major organisations was followed by intensive learning in personal development, values systems and multiple intelligences. Brought together, these create a transformational perspective for understanding and developing organisations as living systems. Jon is a master trainer in Spiral Dynamics, a founder director of the UK chapter of Conscious Capitalism and a certified Spiritual Intelligence coach. He is the author of several books and articles and is developer of Relational Being, a visionary whole systems approach to evidence-based spirituality, complexity science, human emergence, societal change and conscious business. This breadth of experience and deep understanding informs his work as a consultant, coach, trainer and facilitator.